Part 4 presents you with a short news report or announcement. This could be something you’d hear on the radio, a public service broadcast, or a news podcast snippet. It’s usually a monologue (one speaker, like a news anchor or reporter). There are 5 questions on Part 4.
The language is a bit more formal and condensed (lots of information packed in a short time). It might describe an event, an incident, a policy update, community news, weather alert, etc. The style is factual, though it may include a quote or a brief comment from someone involved.
What to Expect in Part 4
- Structure: News reports often follow a pattern:
- Lead (Opening): A summary of the main point (who/what happened).
- Details: Additional specifics like when, where, how, why, responses, and any quotes.
- Closing: possibly a conclusion or latest status (e.g., investigation ongoing, advice to public, etc.).
- Content: Could be:
- A local news story (e.g., a traffic change, a city event, a minor accident or incident).
- A larger news event summarized.
- An official announcement (like a new policy or an emergency warning).
- Tone: Typically objective and informative. If it’s a public announcement, it might have an instructive tone (“Residents are advised to stay indoors…”).
Recommended Approach:
- Catch the Headline/Main Idea Immediately: The first sentence or two usually delivers the core of the story. E.g., “In Cityville today, a major water main break has left thousands of residents without water.” As soon as you hear that, mentally note: Main story: water main break in Cityville, thousands affected. This will likely answer a “main idea” question or at least guide all others.
- Note Key Facts (5W1H): In journalism, they talk about Who, What, Where, When, Why, and How. Try to capture as many of these as are present:
- Who: Who is involved? (Residents of Cityville, City Mayor, Police, etc.)
- What: What happened? (Water main break, causing outage)
- Where: Location of event. (Cityville, or a street name, etc.)
- When: If mentioned, note the time or day. (“this morning”, “yesterday afternoon at 3 PM”).
- Why/How: Cause of the event if given. (Maybe “due to aging infrastructure”).
- Consequences: How it affects people (no water, road closures) – kind of the “so what”.
- Any official actions or next steps: (repair crews on site, estimated fix by evening, etc.) If numbers or specific names are given (e.g., “5,000 homes”, “Mayor John Doe”), write those down.
- Listen for any Quotes or Opinions: Sometimes a news item might include a short quote from an official or a witness, e.g., “Fire Chief Smith called the situation ‘under control’.” If so, note who said it and the gist (“under control”). A question might ask, “What does the Fire Chief say about the situation?” – answer: that it’s under control.
- Understand the Outcome or Current Status: By the end, what’s the status? Is everything resolved, or ongoing, or advice given? E.g., “Repair crews are working and water service is expected to resume by tonight.” Or “Police are investigating and ask anyone with info to come forward.” This is often asked: “What are residents advised to do?” or “What is being done about the situation now?”
- Differentiate Fact vs. Hypothesis: If the news mentions possible causes or unconfirmed details (words like “likely, suspected, possible”), keep those in mind. A question might test if you know what is confirmed vs. just suspected. For instance, “The cause of the fire is not yet known but investigators believe it may have been sparked by old wiring.” A trap answer might state the cause as definite, which would be wrong.
Common Question Types in Part 4:
- Main Idea/Gist: “What is the news report mainly about?” – ensure you have the core event in mind.
- Specific detail: Could be any of the 5Ws – “When did the event happen?” or “How many people were affected?” or “Where did it occur exactly?” – check your notes.
- Cause/Reason: “What was the cause of the incident, according to the report?” – if given, or if unknown, the answer might be “It’s still under investigation.”
- Action taken or advised: “What steps are being taken in response?” or “What are people being advised to do?” – e.g., boil water advisory, avoid the area, etc.
- Speaker’s statement: “What did [official/witness] say about the event?” – referencing a quote or paraphrase from someone in the report.
- Inference from context: sometimes, “What can be inferred about the situation now?” – e.g., if they said water will resume by tonight, you can infer the situation is temporary and being handled. Or if “police are searching for a suspect,” you infer the suspect hasn’t been caught yet.
- Possibly a vocabulary question (rarely): If there's a very important term (like “evacuate”), the question might effectively test if you understood it in context (“What are residents being asked to do?” – answer: leave the area temporarily if “evacuate” was used).
Tips for Part 4:
- Focus on clarity: News reading is usually clear but can be a bit fast. They also sometimes pack a lot into one sentence. Stay calm and catch the big pieces. If you miss a minor detail, concentrate on the next. Often the main points will be repeated or rephrased.
- Keep timeline straight: If the report refers to times, who did what when, keep an order in notes. For example, a story: morning accident -> afternoon press conference. A question might ask “When did the mayor speak to reporters?” – from notes: afternoon.
- Expect abbreviations: Sometimes acronyms appear (like a company name or an organization, e.g., FDA, WHO). Usually, they won’t quiz you on an obscure acronym beyond context understanding. Note it if you catch it, but if you miss it, try to catch the explanation around it (“The FDA – the Food and Drug Administration – announced a new policy…”). Often they say both acronym and full name.
- Watch out for numbers: Did they say 50 or 15? 60 or 16? A big difference. News often has casualty or damage figures if it’s that kind of story. Write numbers carefully to avoid confusion. If unsure, sometimes the context helps (if they say “fifteen thousand” vs “fifty thousand” – try to catch thousand/hundred/etc).
- Don’t assume beyond the report: Answer based only on what was said, not what you think likely happened. If they didn’t mention something, don’t assume it. E.g., they might not mention injuries in an accident – a trap answer could be “No one was injured,” which wasn’t stated explicitly. Unless the report said it, you shouldn’t assume it’s true.
Common Traps in Part 4:
Trap 1: Incorrect detail (number/place/name). A wrong answer might say “5000 residents” when it was 15,000, or “North side of city” when it was south, etc. Verify against your notes.
Trap 2: Mixing up cause and effect. If the report said “Because of heavy rain, the concert was canceled,” a trap could invert it (“Heavy rain occurred because the concert was canceled” – which is nonsense logically, but tricky if you mis-hear). Keep cause/effect in correct order.
Trap 3: Outdated info vs update. If early in the report it says something like “Initially, officials believed X, but later it turned out Y,” a trap might be the initial (now corrected) info. Always go with the final or updated info given by the end.
Trap 4: Not noticing a negation. If the report says “Officials do not know the cause,” a wrong answer might say the cause is X. Or if it says “There were no injuries,” a trap might imply there were injuries. Pay attention to “no/not” in the news content.
Trap 5: Emotional inference not warranted. News is factual, but sometimes a test might throw an answer like “People are panicking,” when nothing in the report suggested panic (maybe it was handled calmly). If the tone and content didn’t mention or imply panic, that’s probably a trap. Stick to what was said or clearly implied.
Example:
A sample Part 4 could be: “Reporter: Authorities in Lakeside have issued a boil-water advisory after E. coli bacteria was detected in the town’s water supply. The contamination was found during routine testing on Tuesday. Residents are being advised to boil all tap water for at least one minute before consuming it. City officials are distributing bottled water at the community center, and efforts to chlorinate and flush the water system are underway. The mayor said that water service should be back to normal within 48 hours. Until then, the advisory remains in effect. Back to you in the studio.”
Possible questions:
- What is the main issue in Lakeside? (Contamination of water / boil-water advisory.)
- When was the contamination detected? (During routine testing on Tuesday.)
- What are residents advised to do? (Boil tap water for at least one minute before use.)
- What is being done by officials? (Distributing bottled water, chlorinating and flushing system.)
- How long is the situation expected to last? (About 48 hours from the mayor’s statement.)
- Perhaps, “Who reported the issue?” or “How was the issue discovered?” (Routine testing by authorities.)
Traps might include:
- Saying “E. coli was found due to residents getting sick” (the report didn’t say that, it said routine testing, not an outbreak).
- Saying “Residents should avoid using water altogether” (no, they can use if boiled or use bottled).
- Giving wrong time frame (like “within 24 hours” instead of 48).
- Misidentifying location (if the option says a different town).
Our notes for that would probably look like: “Lakeside – boil-water advisory. E. coli in water (found Tue routine test). Residents boil 1+ min. City: giving bottled water @ community center. Fix: chlorinate & flush system. Mayor: normal in 48h. Advisory until then.”
With that, answering is straightforward.
Practice for Part 4:
- Listen to short news clips: Many radio stations or podcasts have “news briefings” of 1-2 minutes. Practice summarizing them.
- Take note of key facts quickly: You can even practice with written news: read a short article and then cover it and list the 5Ws to simulate doing it by listening.
- Rephrase the story: After hearing it, see if you can re-tell the story in your own words hitting the main points. This ensures you got it.
- Stay informed (optional but helpful): If you regularly consume some English news (even headlines), you get used to the style and vocabulary (words like advisory, spokesperson, authorities, etc.). This can make the language more familiar, though CELPIP won’t assume specific prior knowledge of news.
With a solid approach, Part 4 becomes a matter of capturing a small news story’s facts and answering questions just like a good journalist would. Now, let’s move to Part 5, where multiple people join a discussion.