The debate over offering tax incentives for local businesses that hire and train individuals with disabilities versus maintaining standard employment practices - (Reading > Viewpoints)

The debate over offering tax incentives for local businesses that hire and train individuals with disabilities versus maintaining standard employment practices

This pracrice is for Pro Members Only

Read the following message.

The city council's recent proposal to introduce tax incentives for businesses that hire and train individuals Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.

Choose the best option according to the information.

The main concern expressed by Margaret Chen about the tax incentive is that it might . James Peterson supports the proposal primarily because . Sarah Martinez's perspective differs from Peterson's in that she . According to Dr. Williams, the most effective approach would be to . The proposed initiative would require businesses to to qualify for tax benefits.

The following is a comment by a reader. Complete the comment by choosing the best option to fill in each blank.

As someone who has worked in human resources for twenty years, I find this debate fascinating. The council's proposal the real issues facing businesses today. While Peterson makes a valid point about employment gaps, . Martinez's experience actually , and I've seen similar results in other companies. However, I think Dr. Williams when he suggests a temporary program. The key to success in this area is , not just throwing money at the problem.

Back to Questions