Should Employee Performance Be Tracked with Digital Monitoring? - (Reading > Viewpoints)

Should Employee Performance Be Tracked with Digital Monitoring?

For Pro Members Only

Read the following message.

The digital monitoring of employees has surged in recent years, with a 2022 Gartner survey revealing that 60% Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.

Choose the best option according to the information.

1. The article mainly discusses the . 2. Sarah Chen believes that monitoring software . 3. Marcus Okafor's main criticism of digital monitoring is that it . 4. According to Dr. Winters' research, employees under surveillance are likely to . 5. Patricia Lam's proposed solution suggests that .

The following is a comment by a reader. Complete the comment by choosing the best option to fill in each blank.

This debate about workplace monitoring the modern corporate environment. While I understand Chen's perspective that , I find myself more aligned with Okafor's concerns. The notion that every aspect of work can be quantified through digital activity is . Dr. Winters' findings about increased stress levels are particularly troubling, as they suggest these systems may actually be in the long run. I appreciate Lam's attempt to find middle ground, though I wonder if even a hybrid approach might still undermine trust. Perhaps the most promising solution is to focus on what Dr. Winters recommends: measuring rather than monitoring every keystroke and mouse click.