Smart Home Assistants: Household Helpers or Privacy Invaders? - (Reading > Viewpoints)

Smart Home Assistants: Household Helpers or Privacy Invaders?

This pracrice is for Pro Members Only

Read the following message.

When Marissa Thornton, a marketing executive from Vancouver, discovered that her voice-activated assistant hadLorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.

Choose the best option according to the information.

1. The main issue discussed is whether . 2. Derek Yamamoto would most likely agree that . 3. Priya Radhakrishnan's primary concern centers on . 4. Based on the article, Norman Fitzgerald's attitude toward smart home devices suggests that he . 5. According to Dr. Elena Marchetti, what will ultimately shape the trajectory of smart home technology? .

The following is a comment by a reader. Complete the comment by choosing the best option to fill in each blank.

This article effectively illuminates the surrounding smart home technology. While I appreciate Derek Yamamoto's emphasis on security improvements, his characterization of privacy concerns as exaggerated strikes me as rather . Priya Radhakrishnan makes a compelling case that . Norman Fitzgerald's perspective is understandable—his situation exemplifies how some users . Ultimately, I concur with Dr. Marchetti that the evolution of this technology hinges on consumer action. Those who value their privacy should rather than passively accepting current industry practices. Only through collective pressure will manufacturers genuinely prioritize transparency over profit.

Back to Questions