Virtual Wildlife Exhibits - (Reading > Viewpoints)

Virtual Wildlife Exhibits

Passage

This practice is for Pro Members only

Read the following message.

When the Grandview Municipal Zoo announced last autumn that it would shutter its physical enclosures in favourLorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.

Questions0/10

Choose the best option according to the information.

1. The article mainly discusses the . 2. Martin Achebe's primary objection to virtual wildlife platforms centres on their . 3. Based on Priya Narayanan's observations, which statement best captures her position? . 4. Dr. Renata Swales would most likely agree that . 5. According to the article, the Grandview Municipal Zoo's decision .

The following is a comment by a reader. Complete the comment by choosing the best option to fill in each blank.

This article raises a question about the future of wildlife education. I find Dr. Swales's argument particularly compelling — her claim that captive exhibition resonates strongly with me. However, Achebe's point about breeding programmes is difficult to dismiss; virtual environments simply . What struck me most was Narayanan's observation that her students questioned whether the animals were real, which suggests that digital encounters remain compared to direct ones. Ultimately, I believe the answer lies in , rather than forcing an either-or choice between screens and enclosures. — Daniel Voss