The debate over requiring pet owners to register their pets for a city-wide DNA database versus maintaining traditional identification methods - (Reading > Viewpoints)

The debate over requiring pet owners to register their pets for a city-wide DNA database versus maintaining traditional identification methods

This pracrice is for Pro Members Only

Read the following message.

The city council's proposal to establish a mandatory pet DNA database has sparked intense debate among pet ownLorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.

Choose the best option according to the information.

Dr. Chen's main argument for the DNA database is that it would . Dr. Martinez's primary concern about the DNA database is . Rebecca Thompson's position differs from the others because she . The Metro City Pet Owners Association believes that . Based on the article, the most significant difference between the current system and the proposed DNA database is .

The following is a comment by a reader. Complete the comment by choosing the best option to fill in each blank.

As a pet owner and taxpayer, I find this debate fascinating. The council's proposal considering the current system's limitations. Dr. Chen makes a compelling point about , but I think Davidson raises valid concerns about . Thompson's suggestion of a voluntary program seems , as it would allow the city to test the system's effectiveness without forcing it on everyone. Ultimately, the success of any pet identification system depends on .

Back to Questions