The debate over requiring public libraries to offer digital device lending services versus maintaining traditional book-only collections - (Reading > Viewpoints)

The debate over requiring public libraries to offer digital device lending services versus maintaining traditional book-only collections

This pracrice is for Pro Members Only

Read the following message.

The growing demand for digital access has sparked a heated debate about whether public libraries should expandLorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.

Choose the best option according to the information.

Sarah Chen's main argument for device lending is that . The pilot program demonstrated that . Marcus Thompson's primary concern about device lending is . Barbara Foster's perspective differs from Thompson's in that . Chen responds to criticisms by emphasizing that .

The following is a comment by a reader. Complete the comment by choosing the best option to fill in each blank.

As a regular library patron, I believe the debate over device lending . While Chen makes valid points about digital access, . Thompson's concerns about budget constraints are legitimate, but . What's often overlooked in this discussion is that . Perhaps the solution is to rather than taking an all-or-nothing approach.

Back to Questions