The debate over making computer programming classes mandatory in middle schools versus maintaining traditional elective-based technology education - (Reading > Viewpoints)

The debate over making computer programming classes mandatory in middle schools versus maintaining traditional elective-based technology education

13:00

Read the following message.

The in . The is a to , some .
, a at , . 'In , is as as ,' . 'By in , we all to these , of their or .' to in , where to to .
, , a at , this . ' is , it be ,' . 'Not all the or , them to .' She the to in that their .
, an , a . 'The to , how to it ,' she . ' of , we be .' that this see the of in the .
The , by , the . ' the of ,' , ' a . We to be .' a to the .
, the on . 'The ,' . ' , we on that of which .'

Choose the best option according to the information.

The main argument made by Marcus Chen in favor of mandatory programming is that . Patricia Thompson's primary concern about mandatory programming is that . Sarah Rodriguez's position differs from both Chen and Thompson in that she . The parent council's stance on the issue can best be described as . Jennifer Walsh's perspective suggests that .

The following is a comment by a reader. Complete the comment by choosing the best option to fill in each blank.

As a software developer with 15 years of experience, I believe the debate over mandatory programming education . While Chen makes some valid points about digital literacy, . Thompson's concerns about student aptitude are somewhat misguided because . Rodriguez's integrated approach seems promising, but . The most practical solution might be to while maintaining some flexibility in how it's taught.

Answer Key

Back to Questions