The debate over requiring restaurants to participate in local food recovery programs for homeless shelters versus allowing voluntary food donation practices - (Reading > Viewpoints)

The debate over requiring restaurants to participate in local food recovery programs for homeless shelters versus allowing voluntary food donation practices

This pracrice is for Pro Members Only

Read the following message.

The city council's proposed legislation requiring restaurants to participate in food recovery programs has spaLorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.

Choose the best option according to the information.

The main point of disagreement between Sarah Chen and Marcus Rodriguez is . Janet Morris's position on the proposed legislation suggests that . According to the text, the current food donation system . David Park's suggestion differs from the proposed legislation in that it . The primary concern expressed by restaurant owners about the mandatory program is .

The following is a comment by a reader. Complete the comment by choosing the best option to fill in each blank.

As someone who has worked in both restaurants and food banks, I can see valid points on both sides. The reality is that . While Rodriguez makes a good point about consistency, . Morris's statement about liability protection is accurate, but . I think Park's suggestion is promising because . Ultimately, the success of any program will depend on .

Back to Questions