The debate over requiring high schools to incorporate life skills courses (budgeting, taxes, basic home maintenance) versus maintaining traditional academic-focused curriculum - (Reading > Viewpoints)

The debate over requiring high schools to incorporate life skills courses (budgeting, taxes, basic home maintenance) versus maintaining traditional academic-focused curriculum

This pracrice is for Pro Members Only

Read the following message.

The ongoing debate about whether high schools should incorporate mandatory life skills courses has intensifiedLorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.

Choose the best option according to the information.

Principal Chen's main argument for adding life skills courses is that . Robert Martinez opposes the proposal because he believes . Sarah Thompson's solution to the debate suggests . According to the text, the percentage of Riverside graduates who . Lisa Winters' perspective is primarily based on .

The following is a comment by a reader. Complete the comment by choosing the best option to fill in each blank.

As a recent graduate, I think this debate . While I excelled in my academic subjects, I found myself when I started living independently. Thompson's suggestion about integration makes sense because . However, I disagree with Martinez's view that . The school board should consider that when making their final decision.

Back to Questions