The debate over implementing mandatory Indigenous history education for all public servants versus maintaining optional cultural awareness training programs - (Reading > Viewpoints)

The debate over implementing mandatory Indigenous history education for all public servants versus maintaining optional cultural awareness training programs

This pracrice is for Pro Members Only

Read the following message.

The federal government's proposal to make Indigenous history education mandatory for all public servants has sLorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.

Choose the best option according to the information.

Dr. Cardinal's main argument for mandatory training is that . Morrison's primary concern about mandatory training is that . Elder Whitedeer's position differs from both Cardinal and Morrison in that she . According to Chen, the main challenge of implementing mandatory training is . The overall tone of the article suggests that the government's proposal is .

The following is a comment by a reader. Complete the comment by choosing the best option to fill in each blank.

As someone who has worked in government for over two decades, I believe the debate about Indigenous education . While Dr. Cardinal makes a valid point about , Morrison's concerns about forced participation shouldn't be dismissed. I've seen how can affect program outcomes. Elder Whitedeer's suggestion of a combined approach seems most practical, although Chen correctly points out that . Perhaps the solution lies in before making any sweeping changes.

Back to Questions