Should Governments Invest in Space Exploration or Focus on Earth-Based Problems? - (Reading > Viewpoints)

Should Governments Invest in Space Exploration or Focus on Earth-Based Problems?

For Pro Members Only

Read the following message.

The debate over space exploration funding has intensified following NASA's announcement of a $23 billion budgeLorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.

Choose the best option according to the information.

1. The article mainly discusses the . 2. Dr. Elena Kapoor believes that space exploration . 3. What would Martin Dubois most likely support? . 4. Dr. Amara Okafor's perspective on space exploration suggests that . 5. According to the article, what percentage of the U.S. federal budget is allocated to NASA? .

The following is a comment by a reader. Complete the comment by choosing the best option to fill in each blank.

This article presents a fascinating on space exploration funding. I find myself torn between the perspectives. On one hand, I appreciate Dr. Kapoor's point about how space technologies in ways we often overlook. The economic multiplier effect she mentions is compelling evidence that space investment isn't just money shot into the void. However, Dubois and Patel make valid arguments about . When people lack basic necessities, it's difficult to justify billions spent on missions to other planets. I think Dr. Okafor offers the most by recognizing that these aren't necessarily competing priorities. Perhaps the real issue isn't whether we should fund space exploration, but rather why we to address both space exploration and pressing human needs simultaneously.